Posts with the tag 'Peter Torkildsen'

Hub Politics Exclusive Interview With Rob Willington on His Departure From The MassGOP

Hub Politics recently had the opportunity to interview Robert Willington, who just announced his departure as Executive Director of the Massachusetts Republican Party. The following was conducted via email December 20-21, 2008.

Q: Last night you revealed that you were leaving the MassGOP as the executive director, can you tell us about that?

A: Yes. I think this interview exemplifies the power of new media. I loaded up my car and decided to share this personal experience with my followers on Twitter and it quickly turned into something much bigger. Bloggers were calling me, State Committee members were emailing me and my Tweeters were tweeting me (that sounds ridiculous).

Q: You are a big fan of Twitter, so clearly it was no coincidence that you revealed your departure from the MassGOP on Twitter, as opposed to a press release from the MassGOP?

A: oops,.. just answered that above. But to add to it, Twitter is a personal Google. For instance, the other day I was hanging with @davidall at McGann’s pub and he was saying how he could ask a question in Twitter and it would be answered immediately. Another person asked him, “can’t you do that with Google?” and he agreed and we both shrugged our shoulders, affirming the question. As I thought about it more, I realized why @davidall preferred getting his answers from Twitter. In life, we desire human, personal interaction and this is the power of Twitter. Google, although great, is a computer and twitter is human - this is why Twitter wins over google when looking for answers. We’d rather get an answer from someone than from a something. Follow me @willington and @massgop @keepthatfaith and @blogsforjoy !

Q: The question on everyone’s mind must be “Why is Rob leaving?” So, Rob, why are you leaving?

A: My heart is with the MassGOP….I’m from Massachusetts (go Rockport Vikings) and love working for the GOP in the bluest of blue states. However, I’m not the CR (College Republican) activists sleeping on couches in campaign headquarters anymore. When I joined the MassGOP, I was a single bachelor….I didn’t need much, I just wanted a basic salary and to travel around the state helping the GOP. Now, I’m married with two recent WeePublicans. My personal world has changed a lot.

Q: So what is more challenging, being the executive director for the Republican Party in a ridiculously blue state, or fatherhood?

A: Executive director for the Republican Party in a ridiculously blue state, my wife is a rock star.

Q: So, what is next for Rob Willington? How about your web projects, Keep That Faith and Blogs For Joy. Will you be focusing more on those now?

A: No, I’m going to be very, very busy. BlogsForJoy.com and KeepThatFaith.com have taken a lot of my spare time recently, but in a way, both projects have a mission to be open-source and collaborative. BlogsForJoy.com should do well without my 100% attention and the same is true with KeepThatFaith.com (donate content), are there any conservatives out there that know their way around Photoshop?

You will hear more from me very soon.

Q: Aside from your departure, Chairman Peter Torkildsen also announced last month that he wouldn’t seek reelection. How do you feel about the future of the MassGOP, given the change of leadership it is experiencing?

A: It’s often joked that “There is nowhere to go but up” but it’s not true - we lost 3 seats this year. The future for the MassGOP is strong because there are a NUMBER of tools for the new team to use. I wrote a detailed manual on what we are doing and how to continue the building at the local level. Politics Magazine noticed how we (MassGOP) were winning non-partisan seats at the municipal level; school committee, selectman, mayor etc…. these candidates attended our trainings and were given access to voter vault. This is revolutionary, empowering these local candidates with sophisticated campaign technology is very important. A state senator once told me over breakfast that the GOP won’t see these results for at least ten years; he is probably right. We launched GOP Farm Team as a site dedicated to building these municipal offices for the GOP.

Q: You made a huge push for internet based grassroots efforts. Do you hope your internet influence will remain part of the MassGOP’s game plan?

A: It will, because it’s all set up - all of the MassGOP Twitter followers, the MassGOP Facebook friends, the thousands that expect mass emails, those that have signed up for our Mass Text messages, those that are dedicated MassRootsGOP.com followers….the new team has no choice because it’s such an efficient way to communicate and get things done. The foundation is built, the contacts (names, addresses, phone numbers, emails) are in the system; we have identified over 50,000 contacts through our aggressive online tactics. This was not easy and the new team has a wealth of info to use.

Also, using the internet is a way to multiply your office - this is what Chris Anderson calls the “Long Tail.” Many hands make light work. We can’t afford a huge staff, so what are our options? Only one answer - empower Joe Activist with the tools he needs to make things happen. When I started, I could not believe how much valuable information was stored on the MassGOP computers. MassRootsAction was my way of exporting this data out of the office and into the hands of the grassroots where it can be much more useful.

Q: Did you join the MassGOP with a set of goals, and do you feel that you accomplished those goals?

A: My goal was to turn the party inside out, to decentralize it. I think I made a major step towards this goal but more needs to be done. Before joining the MassGOP, I had a lot of campaign experience and I always had the perspective as a campaign manager out in the field (I managed two state rep campaigns in Massachusetts). I tried to have a “boots on the ground” perspective knowing how disadvantaged we were as Republicans in Massachusetts. I realized we needed some leverage and new media was the only way to give us leverage without spending a lot of resources. Almost all of the new media tools that we used were free.

Q: Is running for political office in your future?

A: Probably not.

Q: You sure? There is a Senate seat for sale in Illinois.

A: True, but considering the history of that particular Senate seat, I am way too qualified for it.

Q: Clearly, politics is a huge part of your life. What else are you about?

A: I’m working on my next step now - I have Keep That Faith and Blogs For Joy as side projects that keep me busy.  But besides politics and new media, traveling, family, photography, anything British and trying to put a dent in my book collection. 

Q: Do you think there is hope for Massachusetts?

A: Massachusetts voted for Reagan twice and recently had the longest running list of GOP Governors in America (16 years). So, Massachusetts voters can pull the lever for a Republican. In truth, most people are more motivated for personality than principle. I think it’s a mistake to say the Reagan victories were victories for conservative ideals and Obama’s victory is a victory for liberalism. Obama had a strong, likable personalty (the beer factor). Party building continues among the faithful - those that are motivated and involved because of the principles of the party. We can’t wait for a strong, likable personality (a Mitt Romney) to come and be the savior of the MassGOP. We need to act now, while knowing there are not going to be crowds of people coming to build.

One of the most destructive things within the party (and it’s not just the MassGOP that has this problem) is that campaigns feel entitled to MassGOP dollars just because they threw their hat in the ring. Talk about liberalism. If a campaign ignores our campaign schools and we know he or she will get in the mid or high 30’s on Election Day, why should we spend precious dollars on that candidate to bring them a few percentage points higher? What’s the value in bringing a candidate from 38% of the vote to 41% when we could be spending it on a campaign that we know is in the high 40’s? Too often, criticisms are served by people who are zoomed in on their district or area. Only if they could pull back and see the big picture they would have a much better perspective. This isn’t socialism where we are going to split the pot equally among all the campaigns.

The MassGOP can not bring a candidate from 39% of the vote to 50% plus one on Election Day - it’s up to the individual campaign to put themselves in a position to win, then the Party can come in to work like heck to put them over the finish line. Put us in field goal range. However, all campaigns deserve basic support - trainings, technology, lists, example fundraising letters, example direct mail, contacts and open communication with the State Party to serve as “in-house” consultants.

Q: Speaking of “The Beer Factor” there any pubs in Boston you will miss?

A: Yes, below the MassGOP HQ is Johnnies On The Side and we called it JohnniesDownBelow….great spot. Also, McGann’s as mentioned earlier, is a classic Boston Irish pub- you feel that you need to present your passport every time you walk in , it’s a perfect getaway (although there are pictures of John Forbes Kerry on the wall). And of course, the Red Hat was a short walk from the MassGOP HQ and it too has a great Boston atmosphere.

Q: As Executive Director, you were a big part of the Massachusetts Republican Party. With that behind you, who would you like to thank?

A: Hub Politics for sure, you guys rock. I’d also like to thank the State Committee members that were helpful and supportive, and everyone who saw the decentralized vision for the party that I had. I’d like to thank Darrell Crate for hiring me as Political Director three years ago and Peter Torkildsen for hiring me as Executive Director. Brian Dodge was a great Executive Director to work under and he helped me with the old-media when I took over as ED. I also want to thank every candidate that ran for office and carried the GOP banner in a awful year - those people are real GOP warriors. And of course, the troopers on the ground - the Massachusetts Young Republicans, the College Republicans along with anyone that made a phone call or knocked on a door. Amber Hillman and her victory staff were phenomenal with the amount of calls they were producing for John McCain. The BeverlyGOP and their self-organization skills (and volunteer skills) should be copied around the state, the Concord GOP for getting an office up and jamming it with volunteers, the AttleboroGOP for being a mini-MassGOP by traveling around the state helping other Republican Town Committees, and the BerkshireGOP with Peter Giftos, Matt Kinnaman and Jim Bashour. The Berkshire GOP has a full time office staffed by with an Executive Director out in Pittsfield, a very blue part of the state but they have an awesome team.

Q: Who are the political figures that you admire?

A: Washington, Churchill, Thatcher, Reagan. The non-political, but politically influential figures are: Friedrich Hayek, William F. Buckley, Whittaker Chambers, Frank Meyer, Russell Kirk, Dinesh D’Souza, & Thomas Sowell. D’Souza is one of the best minds that we have right now. This is why KeepThatFaith.com is having so much fun with Richard Dawkins, who refused to debate Dinesh D’Souza. This is the first KTF video and here is the follow-up video.

Q: If you could have a beer with any of the aforementioned political figures, who would you pick, and which pub would you choose?

A: Great question - probably comes down to either Whittaker Chambers since his life was so incredible, I loved his book Witness, but William F. Buckley also had an amazing life; former CIA officer, author to several books, ran for mayor, hosted Firing Line, brought the diverse conservative movement under one magazine, founded YAF, avid sailor - he did it all. Buckley is the godfather of modern American conservatism. Probably Buckley. I’d probably take Buckley to McSorley’s in NYC, would love to see him roll up in his scooter coming from the upper east side.

Q: Do you have last message of hope for the Republican in Massachusetts who are tired of the one-party rule here?

A: Yes, stop thinking in terms of “committees.” Someone once said, “if computers ever get too powerful, organize them into a committee - that will do ‘em in.” Next time you go to Washington D.C., or in the State House, look around for a statue of a committee - you won’t find any, there is a very good reason for that. Committees slow the process down and curve productivity (thank God Congress is comprised of committees). Folks, time is flying by and we need action in local communities now. First, set up a blog (our interns can get you one for free, very quickly) and become THE voice of your community, not just the GOP voice. Interview your board of selectman, interview your High School principle, talk to your police chief, how are the local shop owners doing? Take pride and interest in your community and use the blog as the window into it.

There are over 70 million blogs in the world, but there will only be 1 blog with a GOP perspective in your community. Pretty soon, many in the town will be visiting your blog to see what is going on, to see personalities and figures that they see every day - so long as you create good, quality content people will be coming back. Second, too often these committees will meet, eat, and retreat. After each meeting ask yourself this: how did we push back the Democrats and/or advance the GOP at this meeting? Did you combine your meeting with a phone bank targeting likely GOP activists to build the committee, did you combine it with a mailing to recruit new people or raise funds, or asking people to run for office? If we are about local action, then let’s see some local traction and stop looking up to 85 Merrimac Street for a hand out. I know of some other State Parties that often complain to the Republican National Committee for not getting funds or assistance - I have told the RNC directly that I don’t expect anything from them (however, they have given us a tremendous amount of support with our website, voter vault, and guidance…I often used the RNC as a non-monetary resource). Third, go door knocking and talk to the Unenrolled (independent) voters that voted in previous GOP primaries and invite them into the GOP - voter registration card in hand along with an invite to the Republican Town Committee social event that you are having next month. Grassroots means you knocking on doors.

Don’t just be a Republican that shows up once every 2 years to hold a sign on the street corner while sipping a Dunkin Donuts coffee - signs have not, and never will win elections. Enough with the signs. Get to a training and learn about voter identification and GOTV and become a little more sophisticated in your targeting and approach. Sign waving is a secondary campaign activity, not a primary one. GOP campaigns need to focus on the fundamentals that win elections (personal contact from trusted sources) not counting beeps and thumbs-ups on street corners. There are a lot of great posts on MassRootsAction on this stuff.

Finally, I say this as a conservative; enough with the “RINO” talk. What a waste of time. It wasn’t until the 1964 election that the conservatives began to find a political home in the GOP. Liberalism is an old political movement, conservatism is not. The Republican Party used to be the Party of the Lodge’s and Rockefeller’s. The people tossing around “RINO” are acting as if the GOP has held their particular view since the 1800’s. Folks, the movement began only 40 years ago, this thing is still pretty new. If you are a conservative and you retreat because of the “RINO’s” in the Party, then you are giving up on this fairly modern effort and the Party will be less conservative as a result. The same is true with the other camps in the GOP - when I met with the Log-Cabin Republicans, and the Rockefeller/Lodge Republicans etc and they complain that the Party is too conservative I tell them to get more involved because politics is about showing up. If you are complaining about a certain wing of the Party, chances are, it’s because that wing has showed up and you have not. You have two options: show up, or continue to complain about the other group showing up.

Lastly, if you are passionate about an issue then seriously start thinking about starting a PAC (political action committee) to raise funds to help in the 2010 battle. The GOP candidates got hammered with special interest money from the unions and other left-wing groups in 2008. We have a few solid allies on our side, but we need more ammunition. Start a PAC, develop a fundraising team and start building the bank to help candidates in 2010.

If you need help with starting a PAC, or if you want to reach me for any reason (for criticism, or for my address to send me iTunes cards for Christmas) you can reach me at rwillington[AT]massgop[DOT]com

Merry Christmas and Happy Hanukkah everyone and please just do a little something this Holiday season. Joy is not finite - you can create a lot of it today and tomorrow by simply doing something. Visit Blogs For Joy and check the Joy Avenues to find out how you can create joy.

KeepThatFaith,

del.icio.us Reddit Digg Facebook Technorati Google StumbleUpon Yahoo Bookmark.it Ask

1 comment December 21st, 2008

Torkildsen Not Seeking Reelection

Massachusetts GOP Chairman Peter Torkildsen will not be seeking reelection, according to a press release from the Massachusetts Republican Party.

The Honorable Peter Torkildsen, Chairman of the Massachusetts Republican Party, issued the following statement today:

MassGOP Chairman Peter Torkildsen said, “Today, I informed members of the Massachusetts Republican State Committee that I will not be a candidate for re-election in January when my term as Chairman concludes. I greatly appreciate the many members of the State Committee who called during the past week to let me know of their support for my running again. After thinking about it for the past week, I decided I could not commit to serving for the full two year term, and therefore it would be best to announce my intentions early, and allow others considering a candidacy to step forward.”

“During the past two years, we did accomplish some significant steps. First, every Republican last week was re-elected. Second, during the past two years, we raised over $1.5 million, even though this was the first cycle in 16 years where we did not have the benefit of the Governor’s office being occupied by a Republican. And third, we conducted over 50 campaign schools, where we taught candidates and their volunteers the basics of running a campaign, raising money, using technology, and conducting voter identification and Election Day operations.”

“I am optimistic that our Party will regain the Governor’s office and increase seats in the legislature in 2010, as long as we put recriminations behind us, and recruit, train and support our best possible candidates. It has been an honor and a privilege to serve, and I look forward to continuing to work to build two-party competition in Massachusetts,” concluded Torkildsen.

MassGOP Chairman Peter Torkildsen has a long record of public service. He served as a State Representative from January 1985 to December of 1990. He went on to serve two terms in the United States Congress as a Representative of the 6th Congressional District from January of 1993 to January of 1997. He has been the Chairman of the Massachusetts Republican Party since January of 2007.

PolitckerMA.com is reporting that Daniel Winslow, veteran Republican strategist, is not interested in the chairmanship position.

Some Republican circles were speculating that Winslow, who was Mitt Romney’s chief legal counsel when he was governor, might run for the post if current chairman Peter Torkildsen did not seek re-election. But even with Torkildsen’s announcement on Wednesday that he is stepping down, Winslow told PolitickerMA.com that he isn’t interested.

“While I would relish the challenge of reinventing the Republican Party in Massachusetts, I am confident that our rising stars will step up to the task,” Winslow said. “For now, my focus is on my clients and in problem solving in public policy areas. I hope that my ideas, advice and energy can support two-party government in other ways.”

del.icio.us Reddit Digg Facebook Technorati Google StumbleUpon Yahoo Bookmark.it Ask

1 comment November 13th, 2008

Peter Torkildsen Reacts To McCain’s Selecting Sarah Palin As Running Mate

In response to the big news, MassGOP Chairman Peter Torkildsen said, “Sarah Palin is a terrific pick for John McCain and the entire country. Sarah Palin took on the old-boy network in Alaska and won. To change Washington, it’s going to take a team of Mavericks who have a record of accomplishment in shaking up the status quo. Sarah Palin is a tough executive who has demonstrated that she is ready to be president. She brought Republicans and Democrats together and delivered results. While the Obama-Biden ticket is big on talk, the McCain-Palin ticket is big on results. She alone has far more executive experience than Barack Obama and the McCain-Palin ticket will be a ticket to victory in November.”

The pick certain gained the praise of many, and blindsided the Obama campaign, which was actively preparing for McCain to pick Mitt Romney:

Ms. Palin came as a surprise not only to many Republicans and journalists, but also to the Obama team. The campaign has been busily preparing TV commercials to run against Mitt Romney — with aides gleefully watching hours of footage of Romney-McCain exchanges from the primary — but far little opposition research had been prepared about the Alaska governor. And aides said no commercials were ready to be immediately released, which the McCain campaign did when Mr. Biden was chosen.

D’oh.

del.icio.us Reddit Digg Facebook Technorati Google StumbleUpon Yahoo Bookmark.it Ask

1 comment August 29th, 2008

MassGOP Chairman Torkildsen Reacts to Obama Speech

In response to Barack Obama’s speech, MassGOP Chairman Peter Torkildsen said,

The Democrats offer nothing more than the same high-tax, big-government solutions that have failed in the past. For all Senator Obama’s talk of “change,” it clear that the only “change” Americans will see is the kind that will disappear from their wallets. Barack Obama is not ready to lead and not ready to govern. John McCain is the clear choice for Massachusetts families, and will win in November.

The speech reminded me of the kind of fluffed up rhetoric of Deval Patrick gave the voters of Massachusetts.. and look how bad that turned out.

del.icio.us Reddit Digg Facebook Technorati Google StumbleUpon Yahoo Bookmark.it Ask

August 29th, 2008

Deval Patrick’s Prime Time Speech

Governor Deval Patrick gave his prime time speech at the Democratic National Convention. MassGOP Chairman Peter Torkildsen responded to his remarks via press release:

Tonight, Deval Patrick spoke in Denver, but he might have well as spoken in Hollywood, because what he talked about had no basis in reality and no relation to his own dismal record of broken promises. Having an eloquent, but extremely inexperienced Governor is bad enough: an eloquent, but extremely inexperienced President would be much worse. The bottom line is this, Barack Obama is not ready to lead and not ready to govern.

For a transcript of Deval Patrick’s remarks at the Democratic National Convention, please see the extended entry.

Our youngest daughter, Katherine, graduated from high school a year ago. Sitting at her graduation, I couldn’t help but reflect on the difference between her journey to that milestone and my own. I grew up in poverty on the South Side of Chicago. I went to overcrowded, sometimes violent public schools. I shared a room and a set of bunk beds with my mother and sister, so we would rotate from the top bunk to the bottom bunk to the floor, every third night on the floor.

I can’t think of a time when I didn’t enjoy reading, but I don’t remember actually ever owning a book as a child. I got my break in 1970 when I came to Massachusetts on a scholarship to boarding school. For me, that was like landing on a different planet. Our daughter Katherine, by contrast, has always had her own room. By the time she got to high school, she had already traveled on four continents, and had shaken hands in the White House with the president of the United States.

One generation and the circumstances of my life and family were profoundly transformed. And though that story is still not told as often as we’d like, it’s told more often in this country than any other place on earth. That is the American story. It is who we are. It is also what we stand for as Democrats: the simple notion that through hard work, tenacity, preparation and faith each of us has a chance at the American story. That American story is at risk today. More and more families are working harder but losing ground. The poor are in terrible shape. And the middle class are one paycheck away, one serious illness away, from being poor and deeply anxious about it. Together, we can change that. We’ve done it before.

In an earlier generation, as we faced dangers abroad and widespread suffering at home, our leaders responded with more than new policies. They summoned American aspirations and called on a generation to serve and to sacrifice. And that generation, the so-called “Greatest Generation,” fought and won the war; built the federal highway system and great public universities and other institutions; expanded the middle class; and ignited the civil rights revolution. That generation — through their service and their sacrifice — made it possible for many of us to live the American story.

Barack Obama understands that we must renew our commitment to the American story today.

And the gateway is through a first-rate education. That’s why Barack Obama wants to help our kids be ready to learn when they get to kindergarten, by investing in early education. That’s why he wants to fix and fund No Child Left Behind. That’s why he wants to better train and better reward high-performing teachers, why he wants to emphasize more math and science preparation, and why he wants to support the college ambitions of young people by helping them pay for it.

Barack Obama understands, like you do, that a well-educated America will make things again because we’ll be ready for emerging industries like clean energy, life sciences and high tech, which produce good jobs as well as a cleaner environment. And in that new economy, working people will again be able to see a path into the middle class and a secure future.

Now, John McCain says he believes in education, too. But he is against fully funding No Child Left Behind, against fully funding Head Start, against hiring more teachers and wants to abolish the Department of Education. This should come as no surprise. John McCain is just more of the same say-one-thing-do-another crowd in the White House today.

The same folks who say they believe in small government and fiscal restraint are responsible for the biggest expansion in the size of government and the size of the federal deficit in American history. The same folks, with John McCain leading the charge, who say they support seniors, want to privatize Social Security and put corporate pension funds up for grabs. The same folks who call themselves “compassionate conservatives” are the folks who abandoned all those people not only after Katrina, but before that storm. The American people have had enough.

But Democrats don’t deserve to win just because Republicans deserve to lose. If the American story is to have a chance, we need more than better programs and policies. We need better vision.

When I was growing up on the South Side of Chicago in the ’50s and ’60s, everything was broken. Playgrounds, schools, families and lives — all broken. But we had a community. Those were days when every child was under the jurisdiction of every single adult on the block. So if you messed up in front of Ms. Jones’ stoop, she would straighten you out as if you were hers and then call home, so you would get it twice. What those adults were trying to get across to us was that they had a stake in us. They wanted us to understand that membership in a community is seeing the stake that each of us has in our neighbor’s dreams and struggles, as well as our own.

Barack Obama has challenged us to rebuild our national community. To focus not on the things that tear us apart, but on those that bring us together; not on the right or the left, but right and wrong; not on yesterday, but tomorrow. These are the possibilities Barack Obama asks us to reach for. This is the kind of leadership he offers to bring to the presidency — not because government can solve every problem in everybody’s life; but because “government,” as Barney Frank likes to say, is simply the name we give to the things we choose to do together.

This will not be easy. The status quo is a powerful force. A lot of people, including some in our own party, would rather not have anybody rock the boat. If we want the leadership our times demand, we are going to have to work for it. We are going to have to ask Republicans, Independents and Democrats alike to take a chance on their own aspirations for a renewed American story. We are going to have to put our cynicism down and learn to say again, like that Greatest Generation, “Yes, we can.”

If you want the change our country yearns for, if you want leadership that inspires us to bring the best that we have and the best that we are to a renewed American cause, if you want more than a campaign for president, but a cause to renew the American dream, then let’s join hands and go to work to elect Barack Obama the next president of the United States.

Thank you.

Source: politico.com

del.icio.us Reddit Digg Facebook Technorati Google StumbleUpon Yahoo Bookmark.it Ask

August 26th, 2008

Ogonowski Ends Campaign Following Signature Debacle

Jim Ogonowski released the following statement this afternoon:

“I have made my decision regarding the future of this US Senate race. Clearly, we had some issues this week regarding signatures. Mistakes were made along the way. But, any good military officer knows that when you are in command, the responsibilities are yours alone. The buck stops with me and I take that responsibility. There has been and will continue to be a lot of Monday morning quarter-backing and people trying to figure out what happened. But, the truth is, it doesn’t matter. We could play that game all day long. But, the facts are the facts. For a variety of reasons, we did not meet the signature requirements. And at this time, I have decided not to pursue this endeavor.

I provide a sincere thank you to those that stood by me. I am sorry that we did not succeed. I ask for patience as my family and I move forward.”

This is an unfortunate end to Ogonowski’s campaign. With the support Ogonowski had, something like this should never have happened. Hub Politics chose not to make any primary endorsement, and we’re highly disappointed that a technicality, instead of a primary election, decided the course of the GOP race for John Kerry’s senate seat.

MassGOP Chairman Peter Torkildsen released the following statement:

“Today, we congratulate Jeff Beatty on becoming the Republican nominee to challenge John Forbes Kerry for the U.S. Senate. We also thank Jim Ogonowski for running a brief, but spirited campaign. Jeff and Jim both spoke of need for change in Washington D.C., with that change beginning with the election of a new U.S. Senator to represent Massachusetts.

“Now that we have a nominee, the Massachusetts Republican Party offers its full support to Jeff Beatty. John Kerry and Deval Patrick are living proof that one-party monopolies are a disaster for our Commonwealth.”

del.icio.us Reddit Digg Facebook Technorati Google StumbleUpon Yahoo Bookmark.it Ask

6 comments June 6th, 2008

Office Updates

State Rep Lew Evangelidis stopped by to help out the campaign.

Evangelidis.jpg

Janet Wu speaking with Jim.

JimandJanet.jpg

JimAndJanet2.jpg

Chairman Peter Torkildsen speaking briefly with Jim:

PeterAndJim.jpg

del.icio.us Reddit Digg Facebook Technorati Google StumbleUpon Yahoo Bookmark.it Ask

October 16th, 2007

Tsongas’s Extremist Views on Illegal Immigration Ignores 9/11 Commission Recommendations

Mass GOP Chairman Peter Torkildsen sent the following letter to the Niki Tsongas campaign, regarding her support for drivers’ licenses for illegal immigrants.

October 14, 2007

Ms. Niki Tsongas
Tsongas For Congress Campaign
26 Market Street
Lowell, MA 01852

DELIVERED BY HAND

Dear Ms. Tsongas:

Like many Massachusetts residents, I read in The Boston Herald this morning that you support “driver’s licenses for illegal immigrants and a ‘path to citizenship’ for illegal immigrants.”

On your website, however, you claim to “support legislation to implement the recommendations of the 9/11 commission to improve our port and border security.” (http://nikitsongas.com/overview.php)

In case you have not had a chance to read it, I have enclosed a copy of The 9/11 Commission Report, which clearly states the following in Recommendation #18:

“Secure identification should begin in the United States. The federal government should set standards for the issuance of birth certificates and sources of identification, such as drivers licenses. Fraud in identification documents is no longer just a problem of theft. At many entry points to vulnerable facilities, including gates for boarding aircraft, sources of identification are the last opportunity to ensure that people are who they say they are and to check whether they are terrorists.” (The 9/11 Commission Report, p. 390)

I urge you to immediately explain this glaring inconsistency to the voters of the 5th Congressional District. Do you support the implementation of the 9/11 recommendations, or do you support driver’s licenses for illegal immigrants?

Sincerely,

~ S ~

Peter G. Torkildsen
Chairman
Massachusetts Republican Party

Ogonowski, if elected, will be another vote for secure borders and a safe America.

Sign up to volunteer by calling Ogonowski HQ at (978) 269-5080 or by emailing Peter Towey at Peter@JimOgonowski.com.

Also please consider donating to the campaign and help keep Ogonowski’s TV and radio ads on the air.

del.icio.us Reddit Digg Facebook Technorati Google StumbleUpon Yahoo Bookmark.it Ask

2 comments October 15th, 2007

MassGOP Announces New Executive Director

Robert Willington, formerly the Political Director of the Massachusetts Republican Party was announced as the new Executive Director of the Party. The following press release was released by the MassGOP:

The Massachusetts Republican Party today announced Robert Willington of Rockport, MA as its new Executive Director. Willington’s appointment was confirmed by a vote of the MassGOP Executive Committee earlier this week.

“Rob has proven himself as a capable and innovative leader in the MassGOP. He is a person I can count on in our efforts to grow the grassroots, and return two-party competition to Massachusetts,” said Peter Torkildsen, Chairman of the state Republican Party.

Willington who has been the MassGOP’s Political Director since January, 2006 has experience in state representative, congressional, gubernatorial, and presidential campaigns. Willington was campaign manager of the largest ballot initiative in the history of the Commonwealth, the VoteOnMarriage.org signature drive that collected 170,000 signatures.

Willington graduated from Salem State College where he studied Political Science and went on to become the Executive Director of the Massachusetts Alliance of College Republicans. As a leader in the College Republicans, Willington recruited and mobilized thousands of Republican students on campus for GOP causes.

Under Willington’s leadership, the College Republicans worked for first-time state representative candidate Paul Loscocco from Holliston. Willington went on to work for State Representative Paul Loscocco as his legislative aide from 2002 to 2005. While working in the State House, Willington studied campaign management at Suffolk University.

‚ÄúPeople are fed up with high taxes in Massachusetts, which pays the 4th highest combined tax burden in America. I can’t wait to get started training activists and assisting candidates as Executive Director. I’m looking to help build a dedicated network of knowledgeable activists that can effectively carry the GOP banner throughout the Commonwealth. The change starts today,‚Äù Willington said.

Click here for Hub Politics’ interview with Rob Willington earlier this month.

del.icio.us Reddit Digg Facebook Technorati Google StumbleUpon Yahoo Bookmark.it Ask

17 comments September 13th, 2007

Deval Blames “A Failure of Human Understanding” For 9/11

Unbelievable right? Well, it’s true, he said just that.

As fog shrouded the State House steps, Governor Deval Patrick led a solemn ceremony this morning to mark the sixth anniversary of Sept. 11, calling the terrorist attacks of 2001 “a failure of human understanding.” 

Sounds like Deval Patrick is blaming America’s ignorance for 9/11 attacks…

The Herald provides more of the quote:

“Among many other things, 9/11 was a failure of human understanding. It was a mean and nasty and bitter attack on the United States. But it was also a failure of human beings to understand each other, to learn to love each other.”

The Herald editorial staff writes,

We’d like to believe that a few of Patrick’s lines at yesterday‚Äôs 9/11 memorial ceremony at the State House were the product of first-time jitters, or perhaps a truly clueless speechwriter.

Unfortunately, the governor’s fuzzy recollection of that terrifying day seems to be in keeping with a certain “blame us” mentality that so many of his supporters embrace, along with a failure to acknowledge the continuing threat of evil that Americans face.

Mass GOP Chairman Peter Torkildsen issued the following response to Deval Patrick’s shameful comments:

“The only failure of understanding is Governor Patrick’s failure to understand the 9/11 attacks were a cowardly, unprovoked act of war aimed at destroying our democracy and our economy. Terrorists murdered 3,000 innocent people on 9/11, and they were attempting to murder many thousands more that day.”

“Governor Patrick’s speech should carry a disclaimer that his opinion does not represent the opinion of the people of Massachusetts who understand we face an evil enemy bent on the destruction of our nation and our way of life. Many of the terrorists had lived in the United States, surreptitiously, so they had ample opportunity to see how Americans can live side by side, while still enjoying the freedoms our men and women in uniform have fought to protect,”

“The terrorist have made it clear they will not rest until they destroy our nation and the freedoms we cherish. The terrorists want to eliminate our basic freedoms, including freedom of speech, and of religion, and they want to eliminate any semblance of equality for women in our country.

“By calling the attacks ‘mean and nasty and bitter’ and calling on people to ‘learn to love each other,’ the governor sounds like he’s talking about schoolyard bullies, not cold-hearted terrorists who will murder innocent people on command.”

Deval Patrick ought to be ashamed of his ridiculous comments.

More at Deval Patrick Watch

del.icio.us Reddit Digg Facebook Technorati Google StumbleUpon Yahoo Bookmark.it Ask

13 comments September 12th, 2007

Older Posts


Prime Sponsors

Pages

Recent Posts

Twitter Updates

    Local Media

    Massachusetts Politics

    Miscellaneous

    Blogroll

    RSS Deval Patrick Watch

    Archives


    Tags

    Advertisements

    Advertisement

    Buttons For Your Blog





    More Stuff

    Top 10 Sources for massachusetts-politics